Saturday, 29 June 2013

On Love and Before Midnight


It is true that, amongst the noise and destruction that arrives in cinemas every summer, films such as Richard Linklater’s Before Midnight are welcome respites. However, it is equally accurate to say that regardless of its release date, Before Midnight would stand as a near perfect film and a conclusion (possibly) to an unlikely, near perfect trilogy.

Before Midnight reunites us with Celine and Jesse in their early 40s, following their first introduction as 20 something’s in 1995’s Before Sunrise and then Before Sunset (2004), which picked up with them in their early 30s. Each chapter of this romantic tripartite locates the capricious couple in a different romantic locale, only once allowing one half of the romance the benefit of home (Before Sunset concludes in Celine’s Parisian apartment). These (mostly) neutral settings provide a fair battleground as Jesse and Celine navigate the tumultuous path to romantic contentment.

Yet, what separates these films from other films that explore relationships is that Linklater and his co-writers and actors, Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy recognise and investigate the individual, inimitable nature of romance. Many films attempt to attach rules and patterns to their romantic narratives, as if there is a paradigm of love that is universally adhered to. By creating a pseudo-shared experience, such films feel they connect with the audience and in many cases they do. Many relationships will be able to relate to the narratives of romantic films and romantic comedies (a genre which Before Midnight flirts with). But this is a paradox and a false investment on the part of the audience. The nature of love, of romance is that each experience is unique; no two people together are the same.

Before Midnight (and its first two chapters) is very aware of this and the result is perhaps the most honest collection of films about love to come out of American cinema. 

No comments:

Post a Comment