Wednesday, 24 August 2016

On Needing a Shake-Up with Jason Bourne

Another Jason Bourne film will always be welcome. The initial trilogy with Matt Damon just got better as it went on and the parallel move sideways with The Bourne Legacy (2012) added to the Bourne universe. This fifth instalment, fourth with Damon, third directed by Greengrass is, unfortunately, the weakest of the group (but still better than most Bond films).

That’s not to say that Jason Bourne doesn’t have an important message to tell and it is clear to see why Greengrass and Damon felt the time was right for another outing. Here we find the manhunt for Bourne (a familiar narrative arc; he needs another situation thrown at him) set against the backdrop of information leaks and privacy, Islamic terrorism funded by Western regimes and technology giants selling our information. The landscape for Bourne is ripe.

In this post Snowden, post ISIS world, writers Greengrass and Rouse balance the muddled, uncertain, unknowable political issues very well. While the film starts very busy, it settles down into a solid action thriller. It just doesn’t have the impact, in action or narrative that previous Bourne films have had. Bourne ends the film in the same place he began it, with a new nemesis, maybe, but these films have always been about Bourne, not the antagonist. As you would expect, the action is impressively handled, but has nothing that matches the roof top chase and following fight of The Bourne Ultimatum (2007).


Bourne will always be welcome, but this film shows us that he needs shaking up a bit.

No comments:

Post a Comment