Tuesday, 28 February 2017
On Split
It is not untrue to say that Split is the best M. Night Shyamalan since The Sixth Sense (1999), although his vineyard is not full of rich pickings. Despite this, Split is a thoroughly entertaining and oddly thought provoking film. The idea is good and McAvoy is gripping in the lead roles. The scenes between him and Betty Buckley as his therapist are always fascinating. But, the issue with Split and the issue with all of Shyamalan's films is a complete lack of challenge to his audience. A film about a man with multiple and dangerous personalities that involves kidnapped girls should be creepy, scary and challenging. This is not. In Shyamalan's hands it is reduced to its basic oppositions. Sane versus insane; he lays it all out clearly, with well written metaphors to explain complex psychological problems. It is as if Disney made thrillers. We are given everything. No need to think and when the final scene is revealed (mistakingly referred to as a twist) we realise why. This is a fantastical world, a superhero world and superhero worlds take scary, complex real world issues and make them palatable for mainstream audiences.
On The Darkness of Hollywood in La La Land
It is easy to wonder
why La La Land has been quite as
hailed as it has been. The film starts hesitantly and slips easily into
well-worn clichés. Apart from the musical numbers its narrative isn’t that
different from the 200 romantic comedy The
Break Up. Its leading lady is good, but a recognisable character and in
short, apart from all the singing and dancing, many people would not separate
it from many of the fun but forgettable rom-coms that litter cinema screens every
year.
Yet, underneath the
shimmering seediness of LA, La La Land
prods at deeper themes, those of careerism versus familial, or masculinity in
the 21st century. And it is here that we find the reality in Damien
Chazelle’s fantastical picture. Emma Stone’s want-to-be-actress-waitress
appears to be a romantic; she gets lost in film sets and soliloquises about her
childhood dreams of being an actor. Ryan Gosling’s jazz pianist, the more
interesting character of the two, also has dreams, but roots them far more in
reality; he knows life knocks you down and fighting back is not worth it and
after overhearing Stone tell her mother he doesn’t work full time, he sets his
dream aside in favour of regular, yet unfulfilling work.
When the film moves us
forward five years, we find that our initial reading of these characters may
have been misplaced. Stone’s conversation with her mother about job security,
one we read as the mother’s beliefs are revealed as Stone’s. She is now the
famous actor with the husband and child, but Chazelle’s framing of her family
exposes it is she that is the careerist as her husband, shirt untucked,
shoeless, playing with the child, endlessly passive, has no defining
characteristic to speak of. It is to be assumed he has given way to whatever
life he had to be her other half. A role the complicated, vibrant and creative
Gosling never could have become.
As for Gosling, five
years later he has opened the jazz club he always wanted, yet his life, unlike
Stone’s carries reminders of their year together. The logo for his club is her
design, initially dismissed by him. And, when she stumbles in there with her
husband for a nightcap, he comes off worse, leaving the stage alone with a
mournful smile. While she accepts this as acceptance of their separate lives
and leaves with her husband.
Their romance was
destined to fail from the start, as the film’s continuous state of reverie
suggests. Gosling even offers the biggest clue of their fate when passionately
describing jazz, a musical genre he makes her love through his own passion. It
is, he decries, complicated, conflicting, confusing and improvised as it
develops; it is hard work and everyone has to be individual and together at the
same time. This it turns out, is their own relationship and in the end, the
pull of being an individual was too great; they both needed someone to offer no
conflict, no confusion and Stone found it in the passive, anonymous husband and
Gosling doesn’t find it. La La Land,
the title referring to the dream like world of Hollywood also refers to the
attitudes of people who live there. Attitudes which are selfish and careerist
and reveal this to be a far more interesting and darker film that initially
imagined.
On the Top Ten of 2016
10. Everybody Wants Some! dir. Richard Linklater
9. The Revenant dir. Alejandro G. Iñárritu
8. Son of Saul dir. László Nemes
7. American Honey dir. Andrea Arnold
6. Nocturnal Animals dir. Tom Ford
5. Before the Flood dir. Fisher Stevens
4. I, Daniel Blake dir. Ken Loach
3. Arrival dir. Denis Villeneuve
2. Spotlight dir. Tom McCarthy
1. 13th dir. Ava DuVernay
9. The Revenant dir. Alejandro G. Iñárritu
8. Son of Saul dir. László Nemes
7. American Honey dir. Andrea Arnold
6. Nocturnal Animals dir. Tom Ford
5. Before the Flood dir. Fisher Stevens
4. I, Daniel Blake dir. Ken Loach
3. Arrival dir. Denis Villeneuve
2. Spotlight dir. Tom McCarthy
1. 13th dir. Ava DuVernay
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)